HW HomePrevious CNView CNView TNMView TNINext CN

Line 873 - Commentary Note (CN) More Information

Notes for lines 0-1017 ed. Bernice W. Kliman
For explanation of sigla, such as jen, see the editions bib.
873 Or if we list to speake, or there be and if {they} <there> might,1.5.177
1857 dyce1
dyce1: cald2, knt
873 or there be and if they might] Dyce (ed. 1857): “So all the quartos [‘or, “There be, an if they might;”—’]; and rightly, Hamlet meaning, ‘There be persons who, if they were at liberty to speak.’—The folio has, ‘—and if there might (the transcriber or printer having repeated ‘there’ by mistake); and so Caldecott and Mr. Knight.”
1868 c&mc
c&mc ≈ dyce1 gloss without attribution + in magenta underlined
873 or there be and if they might] Clarke & Clarke (ed. 1868): “An ellipsis for ‘there are persons, were they permitted to divulge.’”
1870 Abbott
Abbott § 300
873 there be] Abbott (§ 300): “Be is used to refer to a number of persons, considered not individually, but as a kind or class. [quotes 1876-8] [. . .] But it cannot be denied that the desire of euphony or variety seems sometimes the only reason for the use of be or are.”
1870 rug1
rug1 ≈ dyce, gloss only
873 there be and if they might] Moberly (ed. 1870): “There are some who could account for all this, if allowed to do so.”
1873 rug2
rug2 = rug1
873 there be and if they might]
1877 v1877
v1877 = dyce1 (minus VNs)
873 there be] Furness (ed. 1877): “Dyce; Hamlet means, ‘There be persons, who, if they were at liberty to speak.’”
1877 dyce3
dyce3 = dyce2
873 there be and if they might]
1880 Tanger
Tanger
873 they] Tanger (1880, p. 126): F1 variant “probably owing to the negligence, inattention, or criticism of the compositor.”
1929 trav
trav
873 be] Travers (ed. 1929) “ = are indeed some that.”
trav
873 might] Travers (ed. 1929): “were free to speak.”
1934 Wilson
Wilson MSH
873 they] Wilson (1934, p. 52) lists there as one of the 15 instances in F1 when the compositor misremembered a word, picking it up from an earlier line.
1939 kit2
kit2
873 be] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "a common old form of the plural."

kit2 = rug without attribution
873 might] Kittredge (ed. 1939): "were allowed to speak."
1947 cln2
cln2: standard
873 there be and if they might] Rylands (ed. 1947): "i.e. some could tell a tale if they were permitted."
1980 pen2
pen2: standard
873 list] Spencer (ed. 1980): “wished.”

pen2
873 there . . . might] Spencer (ed. 1980): “(there are persons—meaning themselves—who could explain things if only they were at liberty to do so).”
1982 ard2
ard2: standard
873 there . . . might]] Jenkins (ed. 1982): “i.e. There are (those who could tell) if they were permitted to.”
1985 cam4
cam4
873 list] Edwards (ed. 1985): "wished."
1987 oxf4
oxf4: standard
873 there . . . might] Hibbard (ed. 1987): "i.e. there are people who if they were free (to speak)."
1988 bev2
bev2: standard
873 list] Bevington (ed. 1988): “wished.”

bev2: standard
873 there . . . might] Bevington (ed. 1988): “i.e., there are people here (we, in fact) who could tell news if we were at liberty to do so.”
1992 fol2
fol2
873 list] Mowat & Werstine (ed. 1992): “should choose”
2006 ard3q2
ard3q2: standard
873 list] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “wished”

ard3q2
873 there . . . might] Thompson & Taylor (ed. 2006): “’There are those (namely ourselves) who could explain if they chose to’”
873